Monday, 11 March 2013
Front in the war that pits two giants, often referred skirmishes in which Apple attacks Samsung. The reverse is also ... the result is substantially the same.
The last two years, if you followed the news a little bit of new technologies, in particular mobile technology, you know that Samsung and Apple are not the best of friends. The two firms have launched a legal battle and media to know, finally, that the whole world is waiting, hungry children abused workers, civilians dying in conflicts in the Middle East to SDF spring waiting impatiently which Samsung or Apple, copied to the other.
United States, justice was rather oriented regional preference condemning Samsung widely enough in the largest trial that pitted the two firms. In the UK, the final verdict is rather similar, even if the attack this time came from Korean: he said Apple had infringed its vrevets the transmission of data via 3G. English justice ruled: Apple does not infringe nothing and should not pound Samsung.
Samsung is obviously not happy and lawyers paid in the year for this kind of trial will examine the report of the Court of Justice to see if it is possible to appeal. Apple has not commented, but anonymous sources have noted an increase in the budget champagne and party favors.
The last two years, if you followed the news a little bit of new technologies, in particular mobile technology, you know that Samsung and Apple are not the best of friends. The two firms have launched a legal battle and media to know, finally, that the whole world is waiting, hungry children abused workers, civilians dying in conflicts in the Middle East to SDF spring waiting impatiently which Samsung or Apple, copied to the other.
United States, justice was rather oriented regional preference condemning Samsung widely enough in the largest trial that pitted the two firms. In the UK, the final verdict is rather similar, even if the attack this time came from Korean: he said Apple had infringed its vrevets the transmission of data via 3G. English justice ruled: Apple does not infringe nothing and should not pound Samsung.
Samsung is obviously not happy and lawyers paid in the year for this kind of trial will examine the report of the Court of Justice to see if it is possible to appeal. Apple has not commented, but anonymous sources have noted an increase in the budget champagne and party favors.
